jump over navigation bar
Embassy SealUS Department of State
U.S. Embassy Ankara, Turkey - Home flag graphic
Embassy
 
  About the Embassy Ambassador Remarks Bio Former Chiefs of Mission US Consulates Latest Embassy News Events Webchats Contact Us Holidays

Ask the Ambassador

Archive

Latest Questions

 
 * Question: As you know, the Kirkuk referendum is very important for Turkey.  What is the U.S. view on this referendum? 
 * Answer:
 Ambassador: There are a number of unresolved internal boundary issues in Iraq, of which Kirkuk is one.  The UN is currently working with relevant political parties and communities in Iraq to establish a process to resolve these matters in a way that reassures all.  Whether that process ends in a referendum, or referenda, on Iraq's internal borders or establishes them through some other mechanism is up to the Iraqis to determine.
 
  * Question: We in Turkey are lucky to have an ally like the US.  But, how do we, as allies, deal with those who have sympathies for evil/human rights violating nations like Iran and Syria? (April 2008)
 * Answer:

Ambassador: Every government must take into account the strategic needs of its people against the likelihood of success when determining whether to engage or isolate pariah regimes.  If ineffective, engagement can devolve into appeasement.  However, no country is impervious to financial and diplomatic pressure.  When testifying before Congress on U.S. policy toward Iran, Under Secretary of State Burns remarked “any effective diplomatic strategy must provide one’s adversary with exit doors when it paints itself into a diplomatic corner.”  I would encourage you to ready the entirety of his speech is available at : http://www.state.gov/p/us/rm/2007/81470.htm to better understand the U.S. position on the issue.

 

 * Question: Has the U.S. asked Turkey for more combat troops to Afghanistan? Does the U.S. plan to ask Turkey for more troops to Afghanistan? (April 2008)

 * Answer:

 Ambassador: Turkish troops in Afghanistan are part of NATO's ISAF force there. NATO has identified shortfalls in troops and capabilities there (e.g. helicopters) and has urged all Allies to do more to address the shortfalls. We appreciate Turkey's leadership role in Afghanistan, both militarily in ISAF and in terms of humanitarian and reconstruction assistance. NATO must be successful in Afghanistan and NATO is asking all Allies to do their utmost to ensure that success.

 

 *Question: How does the U.S. view the issue of headscarves in Turkey? (March 2008)

 * Answer:

 Ambassador: The headscarf issue is an internal matter for Turkey.  We do not advocate any particular form of expression, including the wearing of a headscarf or any other religious clothing.  Whether or not to wear a headscarf is an individual choice for women to make.

 

 * Question: Why are US presidential candidates making promises about supporting the Armenian Genocide Resolution?  Are they taking into consideration US-Turkish bilateral relations when they make such promises? (March 2008)

 * Answer:
  Ambassador: The presidential candidates speak for themselves.  President Bush, like other US presidents before him, opposes the resolution.  This Administration recognizes the great tragedy endured by the Armenian people and does not try to minimize or deny the enormous significance of the events of 1915.  Determinations regarding these events should be a matter for historical inquiry and not for political debate in the U.S. Congress. 
 
 * Question: Mr. Ambassador, what is the US policy toward Kurdish people in Turkey? Does a new military effort between the US and Turkey against the PKK mean that the US is changing its policy toward all Kurds? (December 2007) 
 * Answer:

Ambassador: The United States regards Turkey and the people of Turkey as friends and allies. We are encouraged by this country’s great political and economic progress over its 84 years of modern existence that is providing opportunity for all of its peoples.

President Bush stated on November 5 that the PKK is an enemy of the United States, of Iraq and of Turkey. We are focused on working with our Turkish allies and partners in Iraq against that violent, terrorist enemy.

However, it should be made clear that the PKK is the enemy – not Turkey’s ethnic Kurds, nor any other ethnic group in this diverse country. We look forward to working with Turkey and its citizens for peace, security and freedom in the region and in the world.
 
 *Question: My daughter needs medical treatment in the U.S. Why is it that she cannot qualify for a visa based on humanitarian grounds?" (October 2007)
 *Answer:
 Ambassador: Hospitals and clinics in the United States attract patients from all over the world because of our advanced level of medical services. Our consular offices in Ankara and Istanbul issue hundreds of non-immigrant visas each year to individuals seeking medical treatment in the United States. Travelers seeking medical treatment must qualify for a non-immigrant visa in the same manner as other visitors. Part of this qualifying process is convincing a consular officer that they will leave the United States at the conclusion of their treatment. In addition to evidence establishing social and economic ties to Turkey, consular personnel ask for evidence of an appointment with a medical doctor in the United States, an estimate by that doctor of the likely cost of treatment, and documentation that the family has the financial resources to pay the relevant medical bills associated with treatment.
 
  *Question: Mr. Ambassador, why hasn't your country signed the Kyoto Protocol? As a mother and homemaker I am interested in your answer. If you would enlighten me on this I would appreciate it. (October 2007)
 *Answer:
  Ambassador: As a father myself I share your concern about the environment. As Secretary Rice has said climate change is a generational and global challenge and the United States takes this challenge very seriously.

The United States did not ratify Kyoto because it did not include developing countries and it would have harmed the US economy without accomplishing its goals. We believe that to foster a truly sustainable global approach to climate change, international climate actions must accommodate the different regional and national circumstances, and should be considered together with economic and other sustainable development goals. Towards that end, President Bush hosted the Major Economies Conference in Washington, bringing together the 16 largest world economies, the United Nations and the European Union to work towards a worldwide agreement on climate change.

The US is making significant investments for long-term progress on climate change; since 2001, the US Government has invested nearly $18 billion to develop cleaner sources of energy, renewable fuels and sources of electricity, and support for greater energy efficiency.The US is making significant investments for long-term progress on climate change; since 2001, the US Government has invested nearly $18 billion to develop cleaner sources of energy, renewable fuels and sources of electricity, and support for greater energy efficiency. In 2002, President Bush set an ambitious goal to reduce the greenhouse gas intensity of the U.S. economy (how much we emit per unit of economic activity) by 18% by 2012 – recent reports shown that we are on track to meet and possibly exceed the goal. President Bush has demonstrated his commitment to the search for alternative energy in his "20-in-10 Initiative," in which he has set the goal of reducing US consumption of gasoline by 20% in 10 years, by the year 2017. The US Department of Energy is co-hosting a Clean Energy Technologies Conference in Istanbul in November and bringing some of our top experts to Turkey to describe our newest clean coal, hydro, wind, solar and other energy technologies.

 
 *Question: Why is the US commenting about Turkey's deal with its neighbor Iran? Would we ever make an announcement about a deal you make with Canada or Mexico? How does this deal concern you? (July 2007)
 * Answer:

  Ambassador: Turkey’s preliminary MOU on possible gas cooperation with Turkey is of concern for two reasons.

First, an MOU could seriously set back the work that Turkey and the United States have been doing for a decade to develop Caspian Basin gas resources as well as a pipeline infrastructure to bring those resources to Turkey and to international markets. By continuing to support projects like the trans-Caspian gas pipeline, Turkey's regional leadership will help diversity its and other European countries’ energy supplies, make Turkey a key gas transit country and strengthen the developing economies of Turkey’s neighbors. A major increase of Iranian gas exports to Turkey and beyond may hinder the development of gas resources in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and western Turkmenistan that might come to Turkey.

Second, such an agreement could undermine the efforts of UN Security Council member countries - and many others, including Turkey - to persuade Iran to comply with its Non-Proliferation Treaty commitments, pursue full transparency with the International Atomic Energy Agency, and abandon its apparent pursuit of nuclear weapons. While it is true that UN sanctions do not directly apply to energy trade or investment in Iran, it is also true, that since 2004, no major new oil and gas investments or projects with private companies or countries have been realized. This reflects widespread concern about the Iran nuclear crisis and caution in increasing dependence on an unreliable energy supplier that is isolating itself from the international community.

Of course, Turkish authorities will make their own decisions about this country’s energy future. We are confident that Turkey will take these and other relevant factors into account as it goes forward.

 

 * Question: Mr. Ambassador -- What are your thoughts on why the highest level Turkish officials didn't attend the July 4 reception? Do you think it is a reaction to US policies? (July 2007)

 * Answer:

 Ambassador: Our annual Independence Day receptions are an opportunity to celebrate the birth of American democracy, as well as our diverse and complicated history and culture. It is also a time to thank Turks from all walks of life for their deeply appreciated friendship and support as well as to reiterate our commitment to our bilateral relationship with Turkey. At events in Ankara, Istanbul, Izmir and Adana this year, we were pleased to host well over 3000 friends and colleagues from academia, politics, the military, diplomacy, business, science, journalism and many other fields. As in years past, this included a wide range of present and past leaders in various parts of Turkish society. We were honored by their participation.

 
  * Question:  I saw on TV that PKK terrorists are saying that the US is supplying weapons to PKK members in camps in Kandil Mountain. How do you respond? (July 2007)
   * Answer:
  Ambassador: The United States is not supplying weapons to the PKK. It is United States policy that we will have no contacts with the PKK. The United States was the first country, after Turkey, to designate the PKK a terrorist organization. We continue to classify it as such, and on the basis of that, we do not and will not negotiate with the PKK or its leaders, supply weapons to the organization or its personnel, or assist them in anyway. The United States strongly supports and cooperates with Turkey in combating the PKK, PKK terrorism, and other terrorist groups that threaten our interests. We are also working with Turkish authorities on behalf of the unity, security and stability of Iraq that over the long term will ensure that country is a friend to Turkey and cannot be used as a base for terrorist or other attacks upon it.
 
  * Question: I am a 26-year-old Turkish university graduate and interested in joining the US military. Is this possible? (June 2007)
  * Answer:
  Ambassador: In order to enlist in any branch of the US military, citizens of countries other than the United States must be legally residing in the United States and must possess a Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services Alien Registration Card (commonly known as a "Green Card"). Applicants must be between 17 and 34; meet the mental, moral, and physical standards for enlistment; and must speak, read and write English fluently.
 
  * Question: I am a US Citizen living in Izmir. Could you tell me why Ms. Rice is supporting Erdogan and Gul? Could you please address this issue? The Turks here don't understand why the US could support such people. (June 2007)
  * Answer:
  Ambassador: Secretary Rice has expressed strong support for Turkey, for Turkey’s democratic, secular institutions, and for US-Turkish relations. She has spoken of our positive work over the last four and one-half years with the present government of Turkey – as we have worked positively with previous Turkish governments and will work with future ones. She has also appreciated the actions that this government has taken on issues of interest to us – as we have appreciated and will appreciation similar productive cooperation with past and future Turkish governments. She and I both have confidence in this country, its institutions and its future.

The United States government takes no sides in the partisan debates among Turkey’s political parties. Our only candidate and cause is the ballot box, which holds the key to this country’s future as a strong, prosperous, democratic and secular republic, and it would be inappropriate for the United States or any outside entity to be involved in the partisan choices that the Turkish people need to make for themselves in elections.

 
 *Question: To what do you attribute anti-Americanism in Turkey? I saw a video clip of Ataturk talking about Turkish-US relations recently. What’s missing today compared to the ideas expressed in this clip? (May 2007)
  * Answer:
Ambassador: Throughout my career representing the United States I’ve come across people who did not like this or that aspect of the foreign policy of the president in office at that given time. In my view the key ingredient for addressing anti-Americanism here and elsewhere is for our policies to succeed. We should also try to explain what it is that we are doing, or what we think we are trying to do. We should be open and accessible to the people of Turkey, for example to answer questions as I am trying to do on our website. I think it is also important for us to look for other ways to bring our peoples together. Life isn’t just about politics. Life isn’t just about foreign affairs. There are strong business ties between our two countries that we need further to develop. There are strong ties among academicians, among our universities. There are more Turkish students studying in the United States than from any other country in Europe. The words expressed by Ataturk in the clip are still true today: the high value we place on democracy is the tie that binds the Turkish people and the American people together, and this gives us a strong basis for going forward.
 
 *Question: I own an Istanbul-based company that manufactures high quality handmade baby shoes. I would like to export my products to the US. What should I do? (May 2007)
 *Answer:

Ambassador: Congratulations on your success in producing high quality footwear and interest in exporting. Turkish firms have had succegss in the US market, but I want to see America more enriched by the products Turkey has to offer.  The Turkish Undersecretariat for Foreign Trade is one source of help. In addition, the US Mission here in Turkey is working with the Turkish Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges (TOBB) and the US Chamber of Commerce to better connect Turkey’s dynamic small and medium size businesses with the United States. One result of our efforts is a Turkish-language handbook that was recently published, the Guide to Entering the US Market for Turkish Exporters (in Turkish). This handbook is a good starting place for any business interested in tapping into the large, and potentially very lucrative, US market.

 
  *Question: Could the US and Turkey unite to pursue strategic interests in the region? How do you think such a partnership would affect the region and the world? (May 2007)
 *Answer:
 Ambassador:Turkey and the US are already united in pursuing strategic interests in the region and around the world. We have been NATO allies and strategic partners for over 50 years. We see the world similarly, we want similar things -- in this region specifically -- and we cooperate closely in order to achieve our objectives.

In the past year alone, we have had face-to-face talks among senior officials at the working levels on a wide range of issues of common interest. We are partners today on Iraq, on Iran, on the Middle East, on the Caucasus and Central Asia, on Cyprus, on Turkey’s efforts to accede to the European Union, on energy development and diversification, in the fight against international terrorism and on many other issues. We are making progress in broadening and defining our relationship for the future, as evidenced by the "Shared Vision and Structured Dialogue" unveiled by Secretary Rice and Foreign Minister Gul in Washington this past July.

I believe that the Republic of Turkey and the United States will continue to be partners because we want the same things -- peace, prosperity, democracy and freedom. 

 

  *Question: There are many double standards on human right matters in the world. As a strong state, America is not related to these topics. America is seen as only thinking of her own economic self-interest. This political approach will not be an advantage in the long term to America. What is your opinion on this issue? (April 2007)

 *Answer:

Ambassador: The United States has been a beacon of freedom and democratic values since its founding in revolution over 200 years ago. A central tenet of US foreign policy has long been the promotion of human rights, as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights . Respect for human rights, the rule of law and democratic institutions helps to secure the peace, deter aggression, improve quality of life for everyone, encourage tolerance, combat crime and corruption, and prevent humanitarian crises.

As part of our efforts to promote human rights around the world we publish several annual reports, including the 2006 Human Rights Report (link) released on March 6.

As Secretary Rice recently said, we do not issue these reports because we think we are perfect, but rather because we know ourselves to be deeply imperfect, like all human beings and the endeavors that they make. Our democratic system of governance is accountable, but it is not infallible. We are nonetheless guided by enduring ideals: the inalienable rights of humankind and the principles of democracy toward which all people and all governments must continue striving. And that includes the US.

 

 *Question: I tried to submit a petition for my mother to get an immigrant visa but was told that it was no longer possible to do this in Ankara. What happened? (March 2007)

 *Answer:
Ambassador: A law recently passed by Congress has led to changes in the procedures American citizens resident abroad should follow if they wish to sponsor an immediate relative -- spouse, parent or minor child -- for an immigrant visa.

Effective immediately, immediate relative petitions (I-130s) must be filed with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) office responsible for the petitioner's place of residence. This is the place of residence of the American citizen who is filing the petition. For example, an American citizen living in New York now has to file an I-130 petition for his overseas relatives in New York. American citizens currently living in Turkey should file the I-130 petition through the USCIS office in their state of legal residence, for example the US address used for tax purposes.

Although our embassies and consulates are no longer authorized to accept I-130s, we will continue to provide guidance to American citizen petitioners and their family members. However, we regret that this change in US law means we can no longer accept immigrant visa petitions at our posts overseas.

This change may result in a processing delay for some applicants. The Department of State recognizes and sincerely regrets the inconvenience this may cause.

USCIS contact information may be found on their webpage at www.uscis.gov. USCIS can be reached through their National Customer Service Center (NCSC) at 1-800- 375-5283.

 
  *Question: Dear Mr. Ambassador: Which holiday place would you advise American citizens to visit in Turkey? Also, what is your favorite place in Turkey for a holiday? (February 2007)
 *Answer:
Ambassador: I strongly encourage Americans to come to this beautiful and interesting country. Recommendations of one place over another are hard. Picking one city or area over another is really impossible, including because I am still discovering them for myself. But everywhere I have been I have found tremendous hospitality and friendship, not to mention beauty, history and adventure. My best advice to Americans: visit Turkey!
 
 *Question: How can I get more information on aspects of American culture like the influence of the Mormons and social and cultural rights of Native Americans? (January 2007)
 
 *Answer:

Ambassador: The US Embassy’s Information Resource Center (IRC) specializes in providing information on American political, economic, social and cultural life. There are prepared reports on topics ranging from youth in America to the federal court system, from minority rights to American history. You can also request custom-designed information packets on specific topics, like the ones you mention in your question.

In addition to specially prepared reports, the IRC has an up-to-date reference collection, recent government documents and think tank reports, a periodicals section, and an extensive online database collection. The IRC also has special collections on international relations, American history and society, American literary criticism and biography, communications, and U.S. politics and government for use by researchers in these fields. Our electronic resources include online databases offering access to the latest government information and legislation, a variety of other reference databases and numerous CD-ROMs.

All kinds of people make use of this resource – students, journalists, lawmakers, teachers, NGO members and others – and we invite you to contact the IRC whenever you need information. If you are in Ankara or Istanbul, you can make an appointment to visit in person, but requests are also handled via email and over the phone. (For more information go to Ankara IRC,  Istanbul IRC, Turkish pages)

I also recommend you take a look at USINFO where you will find a wealth of information in English on current issues, US culture, study in the US and practically any topic you can think of.

 
  *Question:  Mr. Ambassador, how do you like Turkish food? What are your favorite dishes? (October 2006)
 
   *Answer:
  Ambassador:  Turkish food is fantastic. My family and I particularly like Adana kebab, lahmacun, pide, and dolmas and other mezze dishes. My wife and I also enjoy the diversity of fish available here, especially in Istanbul and along the coast. I really enjoyed the turkey speciality of one reastaurant in Diyarbakir, and the peppers in Mardin and Sanliurfa were wonderful. My only regret is that I don’t like eggplant. Fortunately, my wife is usually willing to eat my portion!
 
  *Question: Mr. Ambassador, when you were in Washington earlier this month, you decided to comment on Turkey’s internal politics.  Why? (October 2006)
 
  *Answer:
 Ambassador:  Several individuals have written to Ask the Ambassador regarding remarks I was reported to have made concerning recent speeches given by President Sezer and Chief of the Turkish General Staff Gen. Buyukanit.  I am pleased to be able to answer these questions and in doing so to be able to correct the record. 

Press coverage of what I said during a meeting with Turkish journalists in Washington on October 3 was inaccurate.  Subsequent reporting and commentary in the Turkish media partially corrected the record about what I said, but the initial impression for many people is what they may remember and that is unfortunate. 

The central message that I intended to convey – then as now – is one of respect and support.  It is an honor for me to serve as the American Ambassador to this great country and I want to do everything possible to support the institutions of democratic governance on which it was founded.  I did not and will not take a position in support of one side or another in matters of domestic debate.  My objective is to advance a partnership between our two countries that advances the national interests of both Turkey and America. 

Attached below is the full text of my remarks in both Turkish and English, so that interested readers can judge for themselves.  What I intended to convey with my answers to the journalists’ questions were three main points: 

  • that I had not read – and thus had no comment about --  what President Sezer and General Buyukanit said;
  • that there is often a lively debate going on in this country about a wide range of issues -- as befits a democracy; and
  • that the United States has a high degree of confidence in Turkey as a strong, stable, secure, secular democracy – values that are central to the relationship that exists between our two countries.

The Republic of Turkey is an ally, a partner, and a friend of the United States.  My mission here is to advance that relationship and to convey the respect and the admiration that is at the heart of our collaboration. 

With best regards,
Ross Wilson


----------------------
Attachments:

 
 *Question: What do you think about the map used by the US officials in Rome? This map was also published in Armed Forces Journal. Turkish sovereignty is violated in the map which shows south-east region of Turkey separated from the country. (September 2006)
 
 
 *Answer:

Ambassador: The map you are asking about in no way reflects US policy.  The map, published in Armed Forces Journal -- not an official government or military magazine -- accompanied an article written by Army Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Peters, a retired military officer. As a private citizen, he writes and he says what he thinks.  The map does not reflect United States Government policy and in fact is contrary to the goals that we are working -- together with our Turkish friends and allies -- to achieve, namely a unified and democratic Iraq that enjoys internal stability and peace with its neighbors.  

Turkey has been an ally of the United States for 50 years, and we are committed to the defense of Turkey by treaty. We continue to respect the territorial integrity of Turkey.

The incident in Rome that you refer to was part of a NATO Defense College lecture.  The NATO Defense College, like other war colleges of its type is a place of academic freedom where students and instructors are free to openly debate explore ideas.  This type of open debate strengthens the ability of our militaries to think critically and strategize more effectively.  

In US military colleges, government policies are often debated and a variety of opinions on current policy can be found in those classrooms.  Open debate is integral to democratic societies.

Finally, I want to repeat that the map you are asking about is contrary to US policy, period.
 

 
 *Question: The US wants to prevent Iran from having nuclear weapons but not Israel? Why can Israel have nuclear weapons and not Iran?  (September 2006)
 
 *Answer:

Ambassador: Thank you for asking this question. The simple answer is that Iran signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) as a non-nuclear weapons state. From this, it derived certain benefits and took on certain commitments, including that it would not seek to develop a nuclear weapons capability and that it would comply with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) oversight activities, which are designed to ensure that all states – especially non-nuclear weapons states – are abiding by commitments to foreswear nuclear weapons. Israel is not a signatory to the NPT and has made no such commitments.

I would also note that the current government of Iran has called for the destruction of Israel – for wiping it off the map. This stated commitment to destroy another member of the United Nations is without precedent in international practice since World War II. This, among other things, requires the international community to give special scrutiny to the clandestine nuclear programs that Iran has carried out for many years and sought to hide from the IAEA and the rest of the world.

The United States has called upon all countries that have not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, including Israel, to sign the agreement as non-nuclear weapons states. We have also supported the vision of a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction.   

 
*Question: Ambassador, at this critical time in the Middle East, what is the US doing to stop the killing? Also, I'd like to know how you view Turkey's role in the Middle East. (August 2006)
 
*Answer:
Ambassador: The United Sates worked hard to help pass UN Security Council Resolution 1701 that aimed to bring about the cessation of hostilities that occurred on August 14. It provides political principles to secure a lasting peace: no foreign forces, no weapons, and no authority in Lebanon other than that of the independent Lebanese government, which must have complete sovereign authority over its entire country. Now the hard, urgent work of implementation begins. The Lebanese Armed Forces, assisted by an expanded UNIFIL stabilization force, will deploy to the south of the country to protect the Lebanese people, secure Lebanese sovereignty, and ensure that armed bands and terrorists do not derail regional peace and stability.

Turkey has played and continues to play an important role in the region – in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in dealing with Iran, and now in talking with the governments in the Middle East. A tangible indicator of this is the government’s consideration now of participation in the expanded UNIFIL mission. Of course, Turkey like other countries will decide on its participation in this and other efforts for international peace on the basis of its national interests.
 
*Question: I would like to know the total exports from America to the Turkish Republic item by item. What has increased and is it a permanent increase? What new policies do you have to increase our business with U.S.? What has changed and will change during your duty in Turkey?  (July 2006)
 
*Answer:

Ambassador: Since my arrival in Turkey, the improvement of our bilateral trade relationship has been one of my priorities. Specifically regarding US exports to Turkey, what I want to try to focus on is providing information to American firms about sales opportunities, purchase opportunities and investment opportunities here. I also want to work with the Turkish authorities to make sure that those US companies that are investing here succeed, and that they feel that they are being treated fairly.  Business investors tend to want to follow other successful investors.

The following link lists all of the major U.S. exports to Turkey from 2001 - 2005. You’ll see that cotton, soybeans and civilian aircraft are among the leading exports from the US to Turkey. It’s hard to say whether or not any increases listed are permanent, however, because this really depends on the preferences of Turkish consumers.

please also visit: Major US exports to Turkey 2001-2005

 
 *Question:  Do you think Turkey's European process is at risk? It seems to me that there is some congestion standing in the way of reforms needed for EU membership. Do you agree? If so, what do you think is the way out of this congestion? (June 2006)
 
 *Answer:
Ambassador: Turkey has made impressive progress on its road to EU membership. It is a long and sometimes difficult process for every country that goes through it. We have encouraged, and I have personally encouraged, Turkish leaders to work aggressively on the economic and political reform agenda they have advocated and that support the EU accession process.  It is an extremely important part of Turkey’s future, and it is in the interests of the United States as well. The US is not in the European Union, so we will not play a direct part in these negotiations. But for decades the United States has given strong support to Turkey’s EU bid. We have tried to play a helpful role in moving things in the right direction, and we will continue to do that. 
 
*Question: I am a college student in Turkey and would very much like to go to the US to study. I have all the necessary documents and enough money to study in the US, but I hesitate to apply for a visa because people say it is impossible to get, especially if your name is Ahmet, Mehmet or Ayse. Is it really that difficult? (May 2006)
 
*Answer:
Ambassador: Thank you for your question and for giving me the opportunity to discuss this important topic.

The US welcomes Turkish students. In fact there are more than 12,000 Turkish students enrolled at US colleges and universities -- the largest group from any European country and the eighth largest group worldwide, and the number of Turkish citizens studying in the US rose 9% last year.  

These figures show that we encourage Turkish students to come to the US to study, not only for their own professional and personal education but because Turkish students in the US enrich the communities they live in and help foster international understanding between Turks and Americans.

So if you are qualified, don't hesitate to apply to study in the US. Once you are accepted by an educational institution, be sure to visit the Consular section of our Web site for details on how to apply for a visa.

 
 *Question: Why do you want to have a base in the Black Sea? As a citizen of Turkey I would like to know. (May 2006)
 
*Answer:

Ambassador: Thank you for your question.

The United States and Turkey share common interests in the region.  We both want to prevent the use of the Black Sea for trafficking in terrorists, weapons, persons and drugs, and we want to foster the development of trade and economic integration. We applaud the leadership Turkey has demonstrated in the Black Sea, particularly with respect to the Black Sea Naval Cooperation Task Group (Blackseafor), Operation Black Sea Harmony and the Black Sea Economic Cooperation forum, all of which the United States supports.

The United States enjoys good relations with all the countries in the Black Sea region and will continue its long-time practice of engaging them, including with visits by US Navy vessels that are carried out in accordance with the Montreux Convention.  The United States does not have or seek naval bases in the Black Sea.

 
- Back to Ask the Ambassador -

Back to top ^

Page Tools:

Printer_icon.gif Print this page



 

    This site is managed by the U.S. Department of State.
    External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views or privacy policies contained therein.


Embassy of the United States